Difference

Submission Instruction

Submission Methods

  • Review Process

    Submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical. Articles submitted to the Conference should meet these criteria and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts should follow the style of the Conference and are subject to both review and editing.

  • All the submitted articles will be passed through two rounds review process. The full paper will assign at least two suitable technical committee members as reviewers for each paper whose areas of expertise have to match with the topics of the papers. The conference secretary will contact you about the review result after the reivew processed finished. Please look out for your email.

  • Submission Methods

  • 1. Full Paper Submission
    Accepted papers will be published in conference proceedings, authors will be invited to give an oral/poster presentation on site.

    2. Abstract Submission
    Accepted abstract will be included in conference program, but will not published, authors will be invited to give an oral/poster presentation on site

    Send the Full paper&abstract to Electronic Submission System. (.pdf only).
    Or submit to: iceeg@academic.net

  • Template Download

  • Formatting Template (DOC) (Abstract only)
  • Formatting Template (DOC) (Proceeding Template)
  • Submission Deadline: Before December 20, 2020
  • Policy on Multiple Submissions

    ICEEG will not accept any paper which, at the time of submission, is under review, is accepted for publication, or has already been published in another conference or a journal. Authors are also expected not to submit their papers elsewhere during the ICEEG reviewing period.

    ICEEG firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtual of any academic. Hence any act of plagiarism is a totally unacceptable academic misconduct and cannot be tolerated. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.